John Walton’s The Lost World of Genesis One re-evaluates modern interpretations of the Creation account in light of growing knowledge in Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) culture and thought. He explains his Cosmic Temple Inauguration view in detail, highlighting the text’s emphasis on God creating a functional universe and the theological claims on which the text focuses. He compares this with other views and discusses Genesis One’s relationship to science, as well as its implications for the public school science classroom.
Overall Impression
This is a fantastic book for anyone who is interested in the intersection between faith and science. Additionally, it is a prime example of how knowledge of ANE culture aids our understanding of biblical texts. John Walton has been one of my favorite Old Testament scholars to read given his expertise on ANE culture, and honest assessments of the text while avoiding skepticism or cynicism. This book is a must-read when considering the various interpretations of Genesis One and having faith conversations with others who are scientifically inclined.
Favorite Quotes
The most central truth to the creation account is that this world is a place for God’s presence (103).
If we desire to see the greatest work of the Creator, it is not to be found in the materials that he brought together—it is that he brought them together in such a way that they work (72).
Taking the text seriously is not expressed by correlating it with modern science; it is expressed by understanding it in its ancient context (133).
Top Takeaways
- Genesis One is a God-inspired ancient near east account accommodating the scientific understanding of the day and not trying to teach anything new about science.
- The creation account describes how God creates a functioning universe to serve as his cosmic temple in which he dwells and we partner with Him in His rule (ie. Cosmic Temple Inauguration view).
- The Cosmic Temple Inauguration (CTI) view is advantageous in that it helps the reader see God as both the creator and sustainer of the universe. We gain a more accurate outlook on the world and a better face-value reading of the text. This view removes the unnecessary barriers to belief for scientifically minded non-believers, as well as frees the reader from having to let science inform what Scripture means. Importantly, the CTI view is not merely an attempt to skirt the science vs religion debate. Instead, the CTI view is a legitimate conclusion of sound exegesis of the original text.
- Science can only speak to physical realities whereas Scripture speaks in metaphysical terms. A rivalry between the two need not exist. However, there are significant implications for how science is taught within our public school systems.
Disclaimer
Please note: If you liked this review or my linked summary, I encourage you to purchase the book. This review is meant to be a supplement to the book and certainly not a substitute.
